Leslie

If I got an info first instead of ragging all becomes other way. I searched Faller from internet and see this works completely different method than simple electrical lines. I can not got exaxt method yet but I see all models are correct. So I wish only a simple cross and no other things.

Only one question: Am I permitted to program and share all of my request so far? Or his case suddenly other obstacles occur if I wish to modify everbody's model?

20 euro is a usual birthday present for me. There is different salary here than your country. I have ambivalent feelings for this. People here is very helpful until I produce something new and different. Very funny, I have not got this experience too often. In common public either everybody hates everybody or normal community.

If I develop here then only 2 kind of answer you can get from me: 1: Sorry, no interest or ability (this can only when you ask direct for me), 2: Of course, as my time permits. Any other answer I hold for myself. I am very curious what shall be your words then.

I wish to buy this program as special offer but not on Steam. Where can I find offers? I know Easter action but only from this forum. I can not find this on homepage.

Carrera models are not exist in MBS so I use Faller. I wish to use a small single cross regardless of its name. If I create it becomes ugly because of overlapping. What do you suggest?

I had similar black track for sure, so please... I can not remember its name so forgive me if asked not authentical. Maybe that was copycat. Check this for example: https://miniverda.hu/go-szettek/carrera-go-62550-gt-race-off-versenypalya-szett.html?gad_campaignid=17701675811 I had neither crossing nor turnouts so I can not say anything for dots. I know if you create shortcut your model can not work in real life and looks funny in model layout.

I had not get permission to post to catalog yet. I also think this would be great. I ask you to open at least draft section (after moderation) to guests.

Please create a mini single faller AMS cross. There is one in existence but this is too big, not usable for me. And please place plastic dots to all crossing wires at crosses to avoid shortcuts. Turnouts are need only 1 dot. My set of tracks was black so I had wish to create black variation too. But I had tried to imagine black stripe on black road and I crashed. I think you had similar problems and this caused current color of tracks. Thank you in advance!

In my younger days we had a similar faller set of track so sometimes created layouts. I created now something similar. As I know, they are very fast race cars at unique twin track and make speed race. If you wish, I create possibility of real race for it. This works as a random race so far without collision detection.faller.mbp

This model works correctly, no problem at all. The problem is display. Correct (some paint problems) manifest is 1st picture. It created from 2 pc. of "T" pic. MBS at loading re-calculates model and replace picture within to wrong place so display becomes to 2nd picture. Data of model remain unchanged so it works correctly and can recover original picture with ease. All is needed to MBS not ruin coordinates of pictures at load.

MBS sometimes misdisplay routes which has 2 identical visible pic. normal: after reload this became wrong: but if I edit this, do nothing and save then display is correct again. So data is unharmed only interpretation is wrong. This branch produces the same, after reload half of the picture disappears: Please correct this error.

This game always holds surprises. Light source is great: vonat2.mbp

Designer has not interested in inner walls so I created them: Arab.mbp

I am managed to create this: but it is not nice. It shall not include for catalog for sure and can help for a little of people. I am sorry about this.

Please, make a triangle from this arrows. I can make only this:

OK. In the future I shall not @quote anybody unless direct permission. But I must know exact enviroment so I ask everybody who interested to answer these: - in my 250 ask most of info request but at least 60 is real asking. Is there among any acceptable, intereting or worthy? - in my 3 serious program error report is there anything ignorable? - in my published layouts is there any that must not published? Which caused problems? Thank you anybody to answer.

I think I begin to understand. You are expect from me to behave like others. 1st year to basic: place rails to panel, connect them, place trains to rails, etc. 2nd year to advance: direct trains from station to another. 3rd year to create own rails and terrain, etc. etc. All cases obey all traditions, never change to any new. That can try in 10 years time if I learned all others perfectly. Is this true?

I tried getVehicleGroup() for this and failed. All groups are from 1 members. I am not use couplers so there is not grouped vehicles? Even if they are compressed and moving together? Then what is getVehicleGroup() for? And how to determine whether if vehicles are compressed together?

My philosopy is differs than many other people here. Example layouts are magnificant here. Such details and beautiful layouts... I can never create anything with this percision and hard work. Some layouts (and some model vehicles) I can not distinguish if it is real or model. But during 2 months I created unique layouts too: nobody created or at least thinked about similar since this comunity exists. Also I am a free beta tester for this studio: never seen errors and missing parts discovered. Every time I have asked for info I got it very effectively (except 1-2 users). Very helpful company. But never, none of expansions have got. Null. Zero. Not an expansion or promise at all. Even if 3 users are asked together me. I reported serious errors too - also nothing response for most of it. Corrections is null, none. I know, nobody has time - but at least a promise, that thing is in mind... I asked 5 minutes expansions too - and nothing. Somebody argued for 20 minutes instead. I can not understand this at all. If I create a program than I write to it all of my ideas even I capable. What is the reason for not create something new which you are capable and not too much time or work?

I do not want hard work for anybody. I searched: This is HD so seems perfect. Smoke is much easier: found in mbs catalog. Of course it is free choice for everyone to create models.

I think about if modeller programs a function that can use everybody with ease. But missing functions can replaced individually for all other designers at all unique pieces of layouts and modells. So modeller's work is much significant, efficient and worthy beacause it causes influence to many people.

In this case where can I get getVehicleGroup() if I do not know it?

Unfortunately these should also be checked, so what is the difference? But there could be an "other" or "draft" area in the catalogue where they would be.

I wish transport goods from "A" to "B" with animation. The track maybe straight or curve but poligon not. Need link and re-link (if possible) but lift or twist only at height difference. The simplest is the best solution. Device must be hidden on simulation mode like other dummies. Do you wish to develop this?