Neo Geschrieben 3. November Geschrieben 3. November Where can I find the layout for testing? A drop from 40 FPS to 1 FPS is not normal. Kind regards, Neo
220hotwheels Geschrieben 3. November Autor Geschrieben 3. November 3 minutes ago, Roter Brummer said: Hello Peter, your shadows are set higher in V9. HG Brummi Hi Brummi Yep I realise that but I've tried all sorts of different combinations including identical ones and it made no difference. Pete
220hotwheels Geschrieben 3. November Autor Geschrieben 3. November 9 minutes ago, Neo said: Where can I find the layout for testing? A drop from 40 FPS to 1 FPS is not normal. Kind regards, Neo I hope this is the file you need 07721643-AFD8-4312-B3FE-B7180B517BD1 Kind regards Peter
Neo Geschrieben 3. November Geschrieben 3. November Hi Peter, thanks for die ID, can you please upload the V8.5 layout as well, so that I can compare both versions directly? Kind regards, Neo
220hotwheels Geschrieben 3. November Autor Geschrieben 3. November 30 minutes ago, Neo said: Hi Peter, thanks for die ID, can you please upload the V8.5 layout as well, so that I can compare both versions directly? Kind regards, Neo Hi Neo There seems to be an "unknown" items in the V8.5 version that I cannot identify so therefore cannot complete the process to get the draft completed. Can I send you the *.mbp file via email? Kind regards Peter
Neo Geschrieben 3. November Geschrieben 3. November Yes, just use the contact link at the bottom of this page.
Neo Geschrieben 3. November Geschrieben 3. November Hi, thank you for the layout, I have fixed the "unknown" objects and uploaded the layout to 6C4E5920-123F-48C9-9395-911F49989FBC Unfortunately, I can not see any big difference between V8.5 and V9, both versions result in similar FPS. Kind regards, Neo
220hotwheels Geschrieben 3. November Autor Geschrieben 3. November 45 minutes ago, Neo said: Hi, thank you for the layout, I have fixed the "unknown" objects and uploaded the layout to 6C4E5920-123F-48C9-9395-911F49989FBC Unfortunately, I can not see any big difference between V8.5 and V9, both versions result in similar FPS. Kind regards, Neo Hi Neo Many thanks for that. I've used your uploaded version for Woodridge, saved it in V8.5 and tried running it The fps is fine and so I've imported that same version into V9 and it too now runs fine. I'm just a little baffled but wonder if the problem was to do with the Nikolaus II items which of course I introduced into that layout whilst they were in draft form. I've now removed them from the both the V8.5 version and V9 version of Woodridge but might consider adding this model to V9 at a later date. Once again many thanks for your assistance with this, my apologies for taking up your time. Also many thanks for sorting out the water reflection issue. Kind regards Peter
Herman Geschrieben 4. November Geschrieben 4. November (bearbeitet) Hello @220hotwheels , @Neo , of course I tested his layout also. 6C4E5920-123F-48C9-9395-911F49989FBC Unfortunately, this layout is to big to swallow in V9 for my laptop. However, V8.5 in rest 70 FPS, when running 24 FPS. Not good , but on the edge of OK V9 in rest 24 FPS when running 4 FPS. And certainly to low. laptop GPU NVIDIA Geforce GTX 3060 , screen 240 Hz gaming display. Ok not the newest one, but not so old yet. Kind regards, Herman Bearbeitet 4. November von Herman picture
220hotwheels Geschrieben 4. November Autor Geschrieben 4. November 8 minutes ago, Herman said: Hello 220hotwheels , Neo , of course I tested his layout also. 6C4E5920-123F-48C9-9395-911F49989FBC Unfortunately, this layout is to big to swallow in V9 for my laptop. However, V8.5 in rest 70 FPS, when running 24 FPS. Not good , but on the edge of OK V9 in rest 24 FPS when running 4 FPS. And certainly to low. laptop GPU NVIDIA Geforce GTX 3060 , screen 240 Hz gaming display. Ok not the newest one, but not so old yet. Kind regards, Herman Hi Herman As you say not great in the V9 version. On my computer in V9 the same layout runs at 28fps upwards depending upon the amount in view. The best I have got thus far with this "modified" version of Woodridge is around 85fps when running and 165fps when paused. Kind regards Pete
Empfohlene Beiträge
Erstelle ein Benutzerkonto oder melde dich an, um zu kommentieren
Du musst ein Benutzerkonto besitzen, um einen Kommentar verfassen zu können
Benutzerkonto erstellen
Neues Benutzerkonto für unsere Community erstellen.
Neues Benutzerkonto erstellenAnmelden
Du hast bereits ein Benutzerkonto? Melde dich hier an.
Jetzt anmelden