Herman

Hello, We can delete deferred executions by hand, no problem. Is there a possibility to delete pending deferred executions of an event in the EV or in LUA trough a loop ? Kind regards, Herman

Hello @Neo . Suddenly I have a layout that does not want to open again. I send the error and an export file to the studio. I have no clue what caused it. The layout was running fine when I closed it, kept it under an higher version nr to start again, but it will not open anymore. This layout was not in my backup in this V7 format. Some help please. Thanks, Kind regards, Herman

Hello @Goetz, I was typing when your previous not came in, and I closed it before ending. Sorry. In V6 I saw your video "route planning" and I made for myself a "route planning and locking in a traject". It was very important for me to handle crosses in the same way as switches and lock/unlock them. But I see a like ? Do you agree it should be preferable that a cross ( or cross-switch ) as far a route concerns has a common part ? Kind regards, Herman

Hello @Goetz, I think Ralf and I understand that. The end point of a route has to be far enough. Still it is a pity that is simple cross is not seen by a route a piece with a common path. Or not ? Kind regards, and thanks for reply

Ralf, I took a cross track from the catalog. And even if I use two crossing rails, with edit I make it to one piece. Those pieces should be considered to have a common piece, because they do. A route should recognise that as a common zone to be protected. Regards, HP

Hello, I do it in English, the Google translate seems to ugly this time. In my opinion crossing rails should be considered as having a common part for the routes. If not, we have a lot of work to do. Or am I wrong ? Greetings, HP

Danke Ralph für die Beispiele. Ich habe das gleiche mit einem normalen Kreuz gemacht. Trifft der Zug auf den Kontakt, wird die Route zu früh freigegeben. Sicher nicht erwünscht. An Bahnhöfen gibt es Kreuzungen und Übergänge. Grüße Herman.

Hello Ralf, Sorry German topic. Hallo, aber alle anderen Strecken sind noch gesperrt und das entsprechende (in einer anderen Strecke ankommende) Signal lässt den anderen Zug nicht weiter. Dann gibt es keine Unfälle. Soweit ich sehen kann, gibt es ein Problem mit der Routeneinstellung? Normalerweise kann es ohne das EV gelöst werden. Es sollte schön sein, dass ein anderer - erfahrenerer Benutzer - auch reagieren sollte. Aber vielleicht musst du dein konkretes Beispiel geben, um zu sehen, was los ist Grüße Herman

Hello, But all the other routes are still blocked and the corresponding (incoming in another route) signal will not let the other train go on. Then no accidents are there. So as far as I can see there is a route setting problem ? Normally it can be solved without the EV. It should be nice thet another - more experienced user - should react too. But maybe you have to give your specific example to see what's going on Kind regards Herman,

Hallo Test gemacht, super. Grüße, HP

Hello, thank you @Neo. The version just arrived here at home. I have still to test it, but for sure I will use it. Kind regards, Herman

Hallo Ja, und in V7 gibt es viele Möglichkeiten für den Straßenverkehr. Es ist daher schwieriger, Autos unfallfrei fahren zu lassen. Grüße, Hermann

Hello for for those interested, für Interessierte -- keep the target in a variable -- behalte das Ziel in einer Variablen vehicle.variables["#AU target"] = vehicle.target -- test print( vehicle.target.name ) -- end test Kind regards, Herman

Hello, @Neo, of course Lua is fine for me. That's what I wanted to know. Thank you Neo.

Hello, I can of course note the target when it is first set in a variable of the car. The original question remains. Kind regards, Herman

Hello, is there in the EV a possibility to find the target of a vehicle (*) ( or I overlooked it again but) ( because it was released random, and after setting another target I want to find the original target again). Or a workaround ? Kind regards, Herman ( the studio shows the name of the target track contact if the mouse is on the target symbol, you can delete it, finding that "end" track contact as new target is enough for me )

Hello @HaNNoveraNer, thank you for remembering me to this link. I read it before, but I'm sometimes distracted and forget things. Anyway, the solution of @michellombart does the job. Now only waiting when Neo implements it in the studio. A big thanks to both of you ! Regards Herman.

Hello Thomas, thank you, I will certainly look at it this afternoon. In the meanwhile : Further testing gave me a solution. I want to share it. But it is not yet Eureka. And I do no not like it. If trains demands different routes it works. So I made an identical second route Route1-2bis. From Form Signal 01 to Form Signal2. The first train activates Route1-2, the second Route1-2bis. Silly, but it works. Thanks, kind regards, Herman

Hello, I need some help from the route specialists. I started again a test route planning like I had in V6, but want to do it with routes in V7 (of course). I'm already a bit further but I will add the most simple version. F0C50114-E303-47C5-866B-AAD916A25EEC ( draft ) - blocking is done by activating the previous route. ( no problem with that ) - as in my V6, the route planning is done by a track contact before the route, it looks wich route to activate if a vehicle is there. As you can see, it seems to work nice as long as trains demands for different routes. If a train is following another and asks for the same route ( that is not yet released * ) it does not work. Suggestions to solve it ? * To simulate what I want to demonstrate : stop a train long enough on Route1-2, only let him go if the next train is before Form Signal 01 Kind regards, and thanks for looking at it. Herman

Hello, even so in previous versions. Kind regards, Herman

Hello, I agree with @model train-old-gray. I mentioded this fact on page 1 of this forum-topic, but it was a combination signal green and a further decelerate to 0 track contact. So if the last wagon of the train is still on the previous track contact, the train will not stop at the next signal. ( yes he stops, but then accelerates again). Kind regards, Herman

Hello, no that is a correct answer to the question. I was of course aware of that in traffic lights,.... and so on. I only ment the signals used in train traffic. Thank you Götz. Kind regards, Herman.

Hello @Goetz, Can you give an example. Thanks, Herman

Hello, In V6 we had this option. I cannot find it in V7. Do I overlook it somewhere ? Or is this option gone ? Whatever answer, the paint system in V7 is great and much more powerfull compared to V6. Kind regards Herman

Sorry @Neo, indeed it just arrived, so I was indeed to soon to mention it. I had also some unexpected errors when I tried to import a .mbp file. Now with 7.0.4.0 it is ok. Kind regards, Herman