Leslie

I am managed to create this: but it is not nice. It shall not include for catalog for sure and can help for a little of people. I am sorry about this.

Please, make a triangle from this arrows. I can make only this:

OK. In the future I shall not @quote anybody unless direct permission. But I must know exact enviroment so I ask everybody who interested to answer these: - in my 250 ask most of info request but at least 60 is real asking. Is there among any acceptable, intereting or worthy? - in my 3 serious program error report is there anything ignorable? - in my published layouts is there any that must not published? Which caused problems? Thank you anybody to answer.

I think I begin to understand. You are expect from me to behave like others. 1st year to basic: place rails to panel, connect them, place trains to rails, etc. 2nd year to advance: direct trains from station to another. 3rd year to create own rails and terrain, etc. etc. All cases obey all traditions, never change to any new. That can try in 10 years time if I learned all others perfectly. Is this true?

I tried getVehicleGroup() for this and failed. All groups are from 1 members. I am not use couplers so there is not grouped vehicles? Even if they are compressed and moving together? Then what is getVehicleGroup() for? And how to determine whether if vehicles are compressed together?

My philosopy is differs than many other people here. Example layouts are magnificant here. Such details and beautiful layouts... I can never create anything with this percision and hard work. Some layouts (and some model vehicles) I can not distinguish if it is real or model. But during 2 months I created unique layouts too: nobody created or at least thinked about similar since this comunity exists. Also I am a free beta tester for this studio: never seen errors and missing parts discovered. Every time I have asked for info I got it very effectively (except 1-2 users). Very helpful company. But never, none of expansions have got. Null. Zero. Not an expansion or promise at all. Even if 3 users are asked together me. I reported serious errors too - also nothing response for most of it. Corrections is null, none. I know, nobody has time - but at least a promise, that thing is in mind... I asked 5 minutes expansions too - and nothing. Somebody argued for 20 minutes instead. I can not understand this at all. If I create a program than I write to it all of my ideas even I capable. What is the reason for not create something new which you are capable and not too much time or work?

I do not want hard work for anybody. I searched: This is HD so seems perfect. Smoke is much easier: found in mbs catalog. Of course it is free choice for everyone to create models.

I think about if modeller programs a function that can use everybody with ease. But missing functions can replaced individually for all other designers at all unique pieces of layouts and modells. So modeller's work is much significant, efficient and worthy beacause it causes influence to many people.

In this case where can I get getVehicleGroup() if I do not know it?

Unfortunately these should also be checked, so what is the difference? But there could be an "other" or "draft" area in the catalogue where they would be.

I wish transport goods from "A" to "B" with animation. The track maybe straight or curve but poligon not. Need link and re-link (if possible) but lift or twist only at height difference. The simplest is the best solution. Device must be hidden on simulation mode like other dummies. Do you wish to develop this?

Hello, how to get the full description of MBS specific LUA commands? Like getVehiclesOn() or getVehicleGroup(). Thank you in advance.

"Construct a switch" So this is the reason? Thank you, no more question for you.

"If you don't use the joints" I already said: i want to use joints. So why impossible place a joint among the lines? Like I said on picture.

I will write much less for sure if you describe this reason.

No, this is completely new situation. If somebody writes the bee, I choose different path across the flowers. Maybe both at same layout. Currently only the stork exists but it is... funny in this situaton.

Thank you. Obviously I can create this - one by one for all vehicles. This is not very efficiency. If a modeller create this once, this is efficient.

There is not any bee... perhaps a simple mallard. But in that case why use rails? Somebody said it is a railway program. I tried to combine this 2.

Dear @fmkberlin you created this model with great accuracy, like an Audi. Everything is perfect, but... where is authentic white smoke? and where is authentic sound? I really miss both. And if you wish I greatly accept index control lights at cockpit. I already created driveable version but these things can made use easier. Thank you in advance!

This is a simple crossing turnout created from 4 lines: So any line can connect to the middle and this is legal, working, accepted, usable, and can not ruin layout, FPS, view, moral or world. I wish ony if this become official with contact points instead of current random and accidental possibility.

What sense? I think things obey physical law or be fun. Water currently none of that. You can not create a normal aquarium now, only can view from above. Decide to follow one of that possibilty. I think water has length and wideness in this program and must follow this, not the horizont. This is not a coder problem, same work both. Plus this effect is so great that worth a unique component (which produce this effect at all rotations).

Happy birthday to you! birthday.mbp

There is a solution... if you want to: A simple change in the program. Not only the edge of lines became connect points but you can choose anywhere. @Neo please develop this and creating became much easier.

I plan a route system with possibility of change lines between red and green lines at orange points. Not only 4 lines but at least 8. What is your suggestion to manifest this with acceptable work and material cost?

Thank you for panel, I missed it. Adjust to stack does not work at vertical panel.